Letters to the Editor

Q: Blindly following one of the Madhabs is a falsehood. Neither Holy Qur’an supports it nor the Hadeeth.

YMD

Your sentences need to be remodeled in view of the following:

  • It is not true that any blind following is discouraged in the Qur’an and Hadith.
  • Blind following of Madhahib is not prohibited by the Qur’an or Hadith.
  • Blind following of a Mujtahid is an obligation of a Muslim who cannot work out the Law by himself.
  • Our religion is that of the Qur’an and Sunnah. We cannot abandon it because of those who know neither the Qur’an nor the Sunnah; both of which demand Taqleed.
  • Insistence on walking through a forest, without the company of a well-armed person is suicide.

You could expect a forthcoming editorial for further clarification.

Q: A Shafi’i Madhab girl for any reason marries a Hanafi Madhab boy. You Madhab people do not accept this inter-Madhab marriage.

YMD

Who told you that?

OK. You don’t know religion. But, in the least, shouldn’t you know practices prevalent in your own society?

Q: Yet, let us say for some reason a boy of one Madhab marries a girl of another Madhab. Your goodness, kindly tell me which Madhab the child has to follow, Hanafi or Shafe`i?

YMD

The father’s.

Q: Save yourself from Hell.

YMD

We are trying to. One of the ways we are trying is to try and chase away Jahl. But do not chase away the Juhala’. They are our brothers in faith.

Q: And advise your readers to that effect.

YMD

That is a good piece of advice. So, let us begin with you.

Yet, we might remind that we only produce a magazine. Saving themselves from Hell is the business of every reader.

Q: I want to tell about extremism. Take the Jamat-e-Islami, it spread its hazardous opinion among Indian Muslims that working for a non-Islamic Government is ‘Shirk’ and thereby taking a Governmental job, taking part in Elections etc., are also ‘Shirk.’

YMD

You are quite not very correct on the issue. Jamat-e-Islami never said that working for non-Islamic governments was shirk. It was Mawlana Maududi who published the opinion that to work for an organization which was not Islamic, was to become an accessory to Kufr and an aide to it. Therefore, he recommended that all those who worked for the Indian government should reconsider their position. He recommended resignation.

That was Mawdudi’s opinion. But the Jamat did not demand from any that he resign a governmental job; although of course, being an organization founded by Mawdudi, they dare not disagree with him. Nonetheless, whatever the reason they had for not speaking out against the opinion, the fact remains that they did not make a demand on Jamat members to resign their jobs.

Accordingly, some Jamat members resigned their governmental jobs, while some did not.

The Jamat never said, so far as our knowledge goes, that working for a non-Islamic government is shirk, as you maintain.

Q: From your publications, I can see that you support this extremist organization from behind.

YMD

You are once again not correct. We do not support Jamat-e-Islami from behind. We support it from the front. We support every organizational activities of Muslims which benefits the Muslims, which does not spread false creed, and which does not deviate them from the path of the Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama`ah.

But this does not mean that we approve of every of their opinion or program of action. We are aware of opinions and interpretations that have a question mark before them, but, we do not go about criticizing the Jamat or the founder – unless asked a specific question. When asked, we state our point of view, regardless of the Jamat liking it or disliking it. Actually, we believe most of the time they dislike it; and we get to feel that they boycott our products. But that does not change our attitude. Some of them might not approve of us. But, on our part, we recommend young men to join them, wherever we feel that that’s the best course for the individual.

Our religion does not approve that we work from behind. We work in the open.

Q: And with its extremist principles it gave birth to almost all terrorist organizations not only in India and Pakistan but the world over.

YMD

This is an overstatement.

Although it is true that it gave revolutionary ideas; and, revolutionary ideas always attract the unschooled youth; but to state that the Jamat gave birth to terrorist organizations reflects the failure to understand the call of the Jamat on the one hand, and global politics on the other.

In fact, the very idea that there are terrorist organizations in India, Pakistan and elsewhere, is wrong. A Muslim can never be a terrorist. Most organizations that are cited as examples are either airy, established by the secret agencies, or products of Western terrorist oil-thieving policies and military actions. So firstly, none exists, secondly, if they do, they have been sponsored by governments that are fearful of Islam and Muslims. When they fail to excite Muslim youth to violence, they target them with violence. That provokes them to revenge. When they take revenge, they are called terrorists. This is a nefarious strategy. But it works. Terrorists are a creation of the Islamophobe West, which some eastern countries have greedily imported.

This is a vast subject and requires a volume to understand. But to say that the Jamat created terrorists, is an untruth of a grave order.

Q: May be the Jamat-e-Islami changed its opinion a bit, but they have not corrected their extreme principles. The books in their libraries are living evidence.        

S. A.,
On Email

YMD

In our belief, the Jamat has not changed a bit, but quite a bit. The revolutionary program has been replaced by social service activities. Yet, their social activities are not too substantial either. Their main and beneficial program now appears to be Islamic-educational and moral training.

The books in the libraries say one thing, people do another. For example, books in your personal library – if you have one – say that you must learn Arabic, but do you do it?

The influence of human literature does not last long.

That is how this earthly life is. Somebody drops a heavy stone in a river: a big splash, ripples and some upheavals. But, a mile down the line, the river is running with no traces of the splash, the ripples and upheavals. It is only Qur’an and Sunnah that remain – through the ages – as the inspiring, revitalizing forces for those who soak deep into this life-giving spring.

About YMD
Subscribe
Donate

Past Issues