Letters to the Editor

Gigih Shofa Uzaman, via email

I’m a Muslim and the only Muslim in my community. I am asked by Christians and people of other faiths about Islam. They often attack me with derogatory statements about Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Could you help to explain about:

– Marriage of Prophet and Zainab, because Zainab was Zaid’s wife or adopted son’s wife, and then Prophet (Peace be upon him) married his wife. What should I say about it?

YMD

The main points to which you need to pay attention are two: increase your Islamic knowledge and, secondly, increase your faith and trust in Islam as the true religion. This will be realized with the help of good deeds. Lacking these, you will be beset with doubts all your life, and those who live in conditions of doubt will die on conditions of doubt.

As regards the doubts raised by those who do not believe in Islam, they are not from their ignorance, but rooted in their rejection. That is, first they decide to reject and then look for reasons of rejection. Truth or untruth is of no regard to them. No argument or debates will be of any benefit to them. They may be invited to what they cannot reject: Oneness of the Deity, above any associates in His Person or Qualities. If they accept this key article of belief, they are likely to accept other facts. Contrarily, even if their doubts regarding Islam are removed, they are not likely to accept their Lord’s Oneness and His freedom from associates and partners, without which they will never earn salvation.

Ibn Abi Hatim has recorded that once a bedouin came up to the Prophet and inquired about Islam. The Prophet told him, “(Did) Allah made your homes a (means of) comfort?” He said, “Yes.” Then the Prophet recited, “And He made for you homes out of the skins of the cattle?” He replied, “Yes.” The Prophet recited the rest of the verses and the bedouin kept saying yes, until when he recited, “That is how He completed his favors so that you may surrender,” the bedouin turned his back and went away. The Prophet then recited, “They recognize Allah’s favors and then deny them” (Ibn Kathir).

The first doubt you have mentioned is a proof of their determination to disbelieve. This is because this particular incident is not found in ordinary books. Reference to it can only be found in large biographical works. So, they have read at least one large biography of the Prophet. Now, if they have read a large work, how could they still remain skeptic about his authenticity? A detailed study of his life brings to visible surface so many evidences of his authenticity, that to remain doubting him thereafter is to doubt one’s own mind and ask: “Am I sane?”

Instead of asking “Why did the Prophet marry Zaynab”, they should be asking, “Why was it that he did not marry Zaynab?” For, they know that the Prophet never married Zaynab. She was given off to him by Allah. No marriage ceremony took place.

Normally, a man and woman have to agree that they will enter into the marriage bond. Occasionally, a mature bride’s assent is waved away. The custodian makes the decision on her behalf and she cannot say no. But, if the groom is mature and sane, he cannot be married off without his consent. In this particular marriage, consent of none of the three major figures involved in a marriage was sought: the custodian, the bride and the groom. None of them were consulted. They – the Prophet, Zaynab and her custodian – were all ignored. The Revelation addressed the Prophet and told him, “You are married to her,” and that was the end of the matter: no proposal, no mahr, no other ceremony.

The Prophet had felt that the revelation to this effect was coming, and he did not like it. But he was told that he should alter his pattern of likes and dislikes. He must agree to what Allah wills. Far from having his own will, he was expected to show the least resistance in word, act or thought to whatever his Lord decreed.

Consider. Who made the laws concerning adoption? Are they in the Old Testament? What’s their origin? Have they not come from the pagan Hammurabi Code? But, are the pagans any authority for the Jews and Christians? If not, then on what basis do they seek to argue with the Muslims?

Consider also. Is human relationship created on the basis of the womb, or on the basis of the word of mouth? Does modern man know something about genetic inheritance or not? On what basis can it be said that marrying an adopted daughter, or an adopted son’s wife is legally, morally, biologically and genetically wrong? Should we talk science, or should we talk the logic of the Church which opposed science for 500 years?

-It’s also about stoning to death for the adulterers, and especially the hadith about a lady who was stoned to death when she did zina (adultery). What should I say about it?

YMD

You should say about it whatever the historical works say about it. That is, a pair committed adultery and was stoned to death. Similarly a man and woman admitted to adultery and were stoned to death.

As for the Jews and Christians objecting to the law of adultery in Islam, you may refer them to the following from the Bible:

“And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire.”  (Leviticus 21:9)

And,

And the scribes and Pharisees brought to him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst, they said to him, “Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. Now Moses in the law commanded us that such should be stoned; but what sayest thou?” (John 8: 3-5)

– Slavery in Islam?

YMD

There have been two types of slavery: the Western type and the Islamic type. The Western type kidnapped from Africa some 20 million blacks for slavery in the British colonies during a hundred years alone (spanning the 17th and 18th centuries). As late as the 19th century, slaves in the USA were kept in shacks that resembled dogs’ pens. Their women were raped at will, and men had their genital organs slashed off, or a foot dismembered, if they ran away and were caught again. They were “owned” by their masters in the fullest legal sense – like any commodity. The masters could, therefore, kill their slaves if they so wished without interference of the Law. The great American Empire owes its present-day glory to the million upon millions of dark-skinned people’s sweat poured over the land for two centuries. (See “Roots”).

The second type of slavery was that sanctioned by Islam: those taken as prisoners of war. All other ways by which one could become a slave were disallowed by Islam. Not only through kidnap, capture or seizure, owing to debts, villages sold off (all methods that benefited the West), were prohibited by Islam, but even someone selling himself off as a slave was disallowed. The only narrow path to slavery left open was that through which prisoners of war arrived at the other end. Side by side, there was another tunnel. And the keys to the door of escape into this path – the path of freedom – were given away to the enemies of Islam. If they negotiated the issue they could open the gates of redemption. But, if they threw away the keys and refused to negotiate freedom through ransom, or exchange of prisoners, then (and when Muslim philanthropists also could not redeem them), then only the prisoners were converted into slaves and distributed among the soldiers. But of course, the keys to freedom were still in the hands of the enemies. If they wished, they could always free their people (99.99% of whom were male) through ransom or exchange of prisoners.

On the other hand the rules of slavery were so stiff and their  rights so many, that many slaves preferred to remain slaves in a Muslim society rather return to the tortuous life of their own countries. A similar example is that of many prisoners in the jails of USA who prefer to remain in jails and receive shelter, meals, bathing facilities, and even education, rather than be freed and live as homeless people in parks and streets not knowing where to go to relieve themselves after filling their stomachs with begged meals.

– And also, what happens if a baby dies (before he/she became mature) in a non-Muslim family, will he/she go to paradise?

YMD

The general opinion is that they will enter Paradise as children and remain children.

About YMD
Subscribe
Donate

Past Issues