Letters to the Editor

Muhammad Imran, via email

Allah (SWT) states: “But whosoever turns away from My message, verily for him is a life (of hardship) narrowed down, and We shall raise him up blind on the Day of Judgment” (Qur’an: 20:124).

Now, why Allah (SWT) used ‘We’ instead of ‘I’? Please explain in detail.

YMD

Not much detail is required for the explanation. The practice of using “we” in place of “I” is common in many languages and is employed to express respect and acknowledgement of authority. This “we” is known as the “majestic we.” It is not the “plural we.”

The practice is common to this day, especially among those who have been influenced by the archaic literature of the past or have been witness to the aristocratic culture of the near-past.

In the recently article published in Deccan Chronicle  I have read that Mr. Tony Blair said: “Mr. Jack Straw had been ‘perfectly sensible’ in addressing the topic (Topic: Line on Veil), while Salman Rushdie is forced into hiding because of Muslim outrage at his 1988 Book ‘The Satanic Verses’ which used more forth-right language.” [NOTE: The topic is about Veil: that women should take off there veil in the Constitution].

My questions are: who is Salman Rushdie? Why he is in international news? Is he alive or dead? Is the book (Satanic Verses) written by Mr. Salman Rushdie Islamic or Unislamic?

YMD

After having reduced Iraq to stone age through 13 years of bombing, and then murdering hundreds of thousands of Muslims there, in an evil alliance with, (as a Nobel Prize winner put it), a rogue country, does someone who goes about now talking on issues such as, the rights of individuals to free expression, or other such related, but sickening, issues, deserve any hearing except in a genocide court? Why should Muslims ever pay any attention to someone who has been termed, by his own countrymen as, a poodle of a rogue king? He is speaking for money. If he got no money out of the topics he chooses, he will speak on race-horses, or casinos, if that will bring him the talk-fee. Apart from barking for the bone, there are other similarities: they bark at every issue they don’t understand.

It is no matter of surprise that a pervert called Salman Rushdie should be dear to the Devil. This man writes a novel of his taste, wherein he insults the most virtuous ladies of the Prophet’s time, not sparing his wives. The only truth that the novel consists is in its title: “Satanic Verses.”

Dead or alive, (unless guided by Allah) the author is equally worthy in both the states of existence and non-existence.

About YMD
Subscribe
Donate

Past Issues